Company Type Property

Some disclosure regimes apply differently to different types of investors. For example, the major shareholding regime in the UK applies differently depending on whether the investor is a UK Investment Manager or not. In that specific case, the thresholds for a major shareholder are lower for non-UK Investment Managers. Rapptr distinguishes between the various applications for specific disclosure regimes via the portfolio property CompanyType. It is an important property to set as it determines which set of rules will run against the uploaded positions.

Please note that it is possible to have more than one CompanyType set for a given entity, for example:

Company type example

The determination of which rules to run happens in the pre-condition of a rule, where the value of the CompanyType property is used as the input. See the example below:

Major: GB - Home - Investment Manager

Major: GB - Home - Non-Investment Manager

Not all disclosure regimes around the globe distinguish between different company types. The jurisdictions that do are Canada, United Kingdom, the USA, Italy, South Korea, and South Africa. Please find a description of the valid CompanyType values as well as the impact it has on setting these.

Please note, FundApps does not fully support an entity aggregation hierarchy where entities/portfolios have mixed company types. For example, if you have both UKIM and non-UKIM entities within your structure, we recommend not using the tag at all to be most conservative. If such scenarios apply to you and you'd like to discuss them further, please reach out to your CSM or FundApps support by emailing support@fundapps.co

 

Valid CompanyType values

CA-AMRS - Canadian Eligible Institutional Investor. 

To be considered for every Entity and Portfolio. This confirms if the entity is an eligible institutional investor (EII) per Canada's rules. EIIs include (for example) Canadian financial institutions, banking or insurance entities regulated and incorporated in the United States or Japan, credit institutions licensed in France, Germany, Italy or the UK, or an investment manager licensed in Canada, Japan, the United States, France, Germany, Italy or the UK. Setting this means the entity uses the Alternative Monthly Reporting System ('AMRS') procedure and not the Early Warning Report.

UKIM - UK Investment Manager or equivalent. 

To be considered for every Entity. This stands for a UK Investment Manager, EEA investment manager, or non-EEA investment manager equivalent. See the UK aosphere memo section A.6.2 for the precise definition before selecting this value. This allows all EEA investment managers and non-EEA investment managers provided that they can lawfully manage those investments in a non-EEA State and that if there were to manage their investments in the UK would require a Part 4A permission, to disclose at the EU minimum thresholds of 5% and 10% and not the lower 3% with 1% incremental thresholds that would otherwise apply for holdings in UK issuers. It is defined in UK regulatory note.

US-QII - US - Qualified Institutional Investor

To be populated for every Entity and Portfolio. Providing the CompanyType US-QII ensures that Rapptr applies the Major: US - 13G - QII rules. If the entity is a US Qualified Institutional Investor or equivalent, then include this value. See the US aosphere memo for detail. If neither US-QII or USPassiveInvestor are provided, Rapptr applies the 13D rule. 

USPassiveInvestor - US -13G Passive Investor 

To be considered for every Entity and Portfolio. This ensures Rapptr invokes the 13G Passive Investor version of the Section 13 rules. If your firm's entities are US QIIs (see above), then use the selection US-QII instead. If an entity is deemed to be a "passive investor" (defined in Section 240.13d-1(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), then include this value. See the US aosphere memo Section 1.7(b)(iii) and 7.2(c) for further detail on how to determine if your entity(s) are considered as "passive investors."  If neither USPassiveInvestor nor US-QII are provided, Rapptr applies the 13D rule. 

ITFM - Italian Fund Manager

To be considered for every Entity. This is to confirm the entity (and it's controlling entities) are equivalent to an Italian/European asset manager/financial intermediary. This would apply to a non-EU asset manager if it would be subject to similar regulations if it had been set up in Europe. Before declaring this value, please ensure that section A.6.16 of the Italy aosphere memo is read and understood. 

For entities that are direct "parents" of a Rapptr portfolio, one must assess if it meets the criteria referenced in the memo. For any entities that control or partially own the direct parent entity, one must also assess if they can rely on this exemption. The memo notes that this must be assessed case-by-case, if the controlling entities are not confirmed to meet disaggregation requirements.

In all cases, this value should only be used if all entities are confirmed to meet the requirements, and must be set (consistently - do not mix entities with ITFM and without) on all entities in the aggregation tree. If not, this value should not be used for any entities as it is not required (i.e. it is an exemption). 

NotZA - Not a financial institution defined specifically in South African law 

To be considered for every Portfolio. This confirms the portfolio is: 1) NOT defined as (or managed by) an institution" defined precisely in Section 1.1.2(a) of the South Africa aosphere memo, and 2) NOT a Section 24(d) Person (which is "a person who buys or sells listed securities in order to: (i) give effect to a reconstruction of a company or group of companies by the issue or reallocation of shares, or a take-over or an amalgamation; or (ii) effect a change in control over management or business of the company.")

It is very likely that including this value (NotZA) would be prudent unless you have specific portfolios or legal entities organised under these laws in South Africa (and meet the above criteria).

In very specific circumstances a non-South African financial institution could still be required to disclose under the FMA regime. It should be noted that Rapptr will not pick those specific circumstances up if NotZA is set as a CompanyType.

KRPassiveInvestor - KR - 5% Passive Investor

To be considered for every Entity and Portfolio. This ensures Rapptr invokes the Passive Investor version of the Korean 5% rule. If a top entity or portfolio is deemed to be a "passive investor" (whose equity ownership purpose is not company management), then include this value. See the Korean aosphere memo (section A.1.4), or check this guide from the Financial Supervisory Service for further details on "passive investors."

US16AExempt - Institutions or persons not deemed to be beneficial owners under section 16(a) in US

To be considered for every Entity and Portfolio. This excludes entities and portfolios from the 'Major: US - Section 16(A) - Insider - Precondition' and 'Major: US - Section 16(A) - Insider - Issuer' rules that are not deemed to be beneficial owners under section 16(a) in the US. For more information on the definition of beneficial ownership under section 16(a), please refer to A&O memo section B.1.6 or this guidance note.

PH-EligibleII - Filipino "institutional investor" who acquires securities in the ordinary course of business without a control intent

To be considered for every Entity and Portfolio. This confirms if the entity acquires securities in the ordinary course of business and is a broker, bank, or other institutional investors of a type specified in SRC Rule 18.1.3 (Section 1.4 of the Philippines aosphere memo). Setting this means the entity is eligible for the less onerous ‘Short SEC Form 18-AS’ disclosure, and not the ‘Long SEC Form 18-A’.

NotJPAggExempt - applies to co-holders (in terms of the Japan regime) which are Concert parties: co-holders in this arrangement are those that have jointly agreed to transact or vote, (most likely when the parent only has a minority of the voting rights in the subsidiary). This excludes Concert Parties from the mandatory 0.1% exemption.

To be considered for every Entity, including the Top Entity. The majority of our clients are co-holders using the Controlled Undertaking structure, as opposed to the concert parties structure. Read more about the exemption at the Major: Japan rule here.

 

 

Was this article helpful?
1 out of 1 found this helpful
Share article